3. The Good Shepherd and the Hireling (John 10)
    
    “It is unfortunate that the chapter
    division dissociates the shepherd allegory from the discussion reported in
    chapter 9. Jesus had convicted the Pharisees of blindness and incompetence in
    dealing with the flock of God. As bad shepherds they had cast out the healed
    man, but the good shepherd had found him” (John Carter, Gospel of John,
    p. 119).
    
    “And they cast him out.
        Jesus heard they had cast him out; and when he found him....”
        (John 9:34,35).
    
    “Him that cometh to me I will in no wise
        cast out” (6:37). 
    
    With bold actions and words, Christ dramatically
    set himself apart from the other teachers of his nation. They pompously dictated
    and threatened; he lovingly instructed and comforted. They “cast
    out”; he “found” and recovered. They “cared not for the
    sheep”; he “laid down his life for the sheep” (10:15), and in
    so doing became the model for all shepherds, overseers, and elders. Doubtless
    Peter had “the Good Shepherd” in mind when he
    wrote:
    
    “The elders which are among you I
        exhort, who am also an elder, and a witness of the sufferings of Christ, and
        also a partaker of the glory that shall be revealed: Feed the flock of God which
        is among you, taking the oversight thereof, not by constraint, but willingly;
        not for filthy lucre, but of a ready mind; neither as being lords over
        God’s heritage, but being ensamples to the flock” (1 Pet.
        5:1-3).
    
    The true ecclesial shepherd, then, must do the
    works of his Master:
    
    
        -  He must feed others first (Ezek.
            34:2).
        
 -  He must strengthen the diseased or weak (Isa.
            40:11; Ezek. 34:4; Rom. 15:1).
        
 -  He must bind up what is
            broken (Ezek. 34:4).
        
 -  He must seek what is lost (Ezek.
            34:4,11,16; Matt. 18:12; Luke 15:4-7).
        
 -  He must assume a
            personal responsibility in the face of a threat.
        
 -  And he
            must be prepared to protect the flock at all costs: “Take heed to all
            the flock....remember that I warned you” (Acts
            20:28-31).
    
 
    The characteristics of a true shepherd are set in
    contrast to those of a “hireling”:
    
    “But he that is an hireling, and not the
        shepherd, whose own the sheep are not, seeth the wolf coming and leaveth the
            sheep, and fleeth.... The hireling fleeth, because he is an hireling, and
        careth not for the sheep” (John 10:12,13).
    
    It is said of the hirelings or false shepherds
    that they “feed (or shepherd) themselves” (Ezek.
    34:2).
    
    “The shepherds shepherded themselves! They
    were prepared to sacrifice the flock for themselves, whereas they should have
    extended their self-sacrificing devotion to the flock and carefully pastured or
    shepherded it” (H.P. Mansfield, Ezekiel’s Prophecies of the
        Restoration, p. 30).
    
    “From these words one would think it
    transparently obvious that in time of danger to the flock from false teachers
    (‘After my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing
    the flock’ — Acts 20:29), a man’s duty will keep him with
    the flock in order that he might exert every possible effort in defence of
    those less able than himself to combat spiritual evil. Yet in sharp contrast to
    this the attitude of some seems to be: ‘There is a wolf in the flock. I
    have told the sheep to chase it away, but they do nothing of the sort. So now it
    is time for me to get out as quickly as I can.’ The incisive word of the
    Lord for men who act in this way is the shameful term:
    ‘hireling’.... Without doubt those who withdraw to an exclusive
    ‘pure’ fellowship are hirelings in the sense in which Jesus used the
    term, for their separatism is solely a means of furthering, as they think, their
    own safety and benefit” (H.A. Whittaker, “Block
    Disfellowship”, The Testimony, Vol. 43, No. 513 — Sept. 1973
    — p. 340).
    
    A hireling may seek to benefit
    materially by his labors, and this of course is a serious offence (1 Pet.
    5:2; 1 Tim. 3:3,8). But, as the Pharisees so amply demonstrated, one may be a
    “hireling” even if he cares not at all for financial profit. He may
    be a “hireling”, for example, in caring for power and authority, or
    for honor and respect without responsibility. He may be a “hireling”
    if he abandons his flock when the “wolf” (or false teacher —
    Acts 20:29) approaches. He thus shows his true character when he saves himself
    first — subjecting his employer’s “investment” to
    possible ruin. As members of the one Body, we should develop the
    mind-picture of ourselves as “partners” in the enterprise, not mere
    employees! The employee is nothing but “hired help”, a
    “hireling” who works for his “wages” and nothing else
    (but the “gift” of God, which we hope one day to receive, is not
    “wages”; our proper “wages” can only be death —
    Rom. 6:23). The hireling is not — as he should be — a
    “partner” or a “partaker”, who expects to participate
    (the significance of “fellowship”) in the ultimate profits of the
    enterprise.
    
    “The disciple of Christ who is worth his
    salt will not beat a hasty retreat, or even a reluctant retreat, at the signs of
    danger, but will persistently and courageously set himself to antagonize and
    expose every symptom of apostasy which may manifest itself in his own
    ecclesia” (Ibid., p. 341).
    
    In the brotherhood, therefore, the
    brother is best off when he cares first and foremost for the welfare of
    his brethren.
    
    “Let any who are troubled by current
    contentions and worried by vague apprehensions as to their own responsibility
    for ‘condoning’ evil ponder these words of the Good Shepherd again
    and again. He calls men to be good shepherds after his own pattern, giving
    themselves in devoted service and care to the harassed flock, and even laying
    down their lives for the sheep. How strange that it does not seem to dawn on
    rigorous separatists that they testify for Truth against error far more
    efficiently by staying where the error is and witnessing against it than by
    fleeing to a ‘holier than thou’ sanctuary, from which to
    carry on a campaign of scolding across a great gulf which they themselves
    have fixed” (H. Whittaker, “False Teachers”, The Testimony,
    Vol. 36, No. 426 — June 1966 — p.
    212).
    
    Is our salvation endangered by
    “fellowshiping” “doubtful cases”? Let the
    “shepherds” of the Bible — types, or patterns, every one of
    the “Great Shepherd” — give the answer:
    
    1. Abraham — whose near kinsman Lot strives
    with him and then departs (Gen. 13:6-8) — nevertheless moves swiftly to
    save his ungrateful nephew from bondage (Gen. 14). Later he even intercedes for
    him with the Lord when his life is threatened in Sodom (Gen. 18): Notice that
    his boldest approach to the Lord is to beg for the sparing of others (18:27,28),
    when it might reasonably be argued that they did not deserve to be
    spared.
    
    2. Joseph — whose brothers plotted against
    him and would have taken his life — still found the love to forgive them
    and take them into his “fellowship” again when they were in great
    distress:
    
    “Now therefore fear not: I will nourish
        you, and your little ones. And he comforted them” (Gen.
        50:21).
    
    3. Moses became the great intercessor for a
    nation that was obviously at fault. His fervent prayer needs no
    comment:
    
    “Yet now, if thou wilt forgive their sin
        — and if not, blot me, I pray thee, out of thy book which thou hast
        written” (Exod. 32:32).
    
    4. David, who always viewed Israel not as his
    kingdom but as his flock, wrote the words from his youthful experience
    which might well be termed “The Shepherd’s Manual” (Psalm 23).
    When he might easily have laid the blame for shortcoming upon a stiff-necked
    nation, and the sword of the angel was poised to continue their destruction,
    David the shepherd-king pleaded their “doubtful
    case”:
    
    “Lo, I have sinned, and I
        have done wickedly: but these sheep, what have they done?
    [He refuses to point out that they have done even worse!].... Let thine
        hand, I pray thee, be against me” (2 Sam.
        24:17).
    
    5. Daniel did not mind
    “fellowshiping” his “doubtful” brethren; he even went so
    far as to pray on their behalf, taking the sins of the nation upon his innocent
    shoulders:
    
    “We have sinned,” he prayed,
    “and have committed iniquity .... neither have we obeyed the
        voice of the Lord... therefore the curse is poured upon us....”
        (Dan. 9:5-15).
    
    6. And Paul, the greatest of the
    shepherd-apostles, could wish that he were accursed for the sakes of his
    brethren the Jews (Rom. 9:1-3), who were not even in Christ! If this
    could be his attitude towards enemies of the Truth, how much more should we
    yearn for and seek unity and brotherhood with those whom we know to be in
    covenant-relationship with Christ?
    
    “So there shall be one flock, and
        one shepherd” (John 10:16, RSV).
    
    The day will soon come when before the Lord of
    all the earth will be gathered his flock (Matt. 25:31-46), his one flock
    — for they will then be treated as one, all the man-made barriers swept
    away. It is then that the true force of the King’s question will come home
    to each of us: ‘What have you done for my brethren? for my
    sheep?’ How confident would we feel to say the following?:
    ‘Lord, I did the best I could for a little while; but then I heard of a
    false doctrine somewhere or other, and I left as quickly as I could. After that
    I really don’t know what happened to them.’